Strava sues Garmin in weird patent infringement la...

Health tech seems to be having an odd spat. Earlier this week, Strava filed a lawsuit alleging that Garmin infringed on its patents for 2 options associated to monitoring train routes: segments and heatmaps. It is also claiming that Garmin violated a Grasp Cooperation Settlement by creating its personal warmth map characteristic. The complaint (through The Verge) is in search of a everlasting injunction to cease Garmin from promoting any gadgets with segments or a warmth map options, which might quantity to a majority of Garmin’s {hardware} merchandise in addition to its Join monitoring program.

The lawsuit by itself is a shock. Strava and Garmin are two main gamers in health tech which have labored collectively for a few decade, the pair have a lot of integrations between their platforms. It additionally appears unlikely that Strava will make a lot headway with the case. DC Rainmaker, which first picked up on the lawsuit, has a radical timeline of the businesses’ patent filings that strongly suggests the arguments will not maintain water in court docket. It is also unusual that these alleged infringements, by Strava’s personal assertions, started a very long time in the past and but the corporate is just taking challenge with them now.

However the state of affairs obtained even stranger when Strava Chief Product Officer Matt Salazar took to Reddit at the moment to provide some perception into why the corporate is taking such aggressive motion towards a frequent accomplice. In line with Salazar’s , Strava is invoking the attorneys as a result of Garmin is adopting new developer pointers for API companions “that required the Garmin emblem to be current on each single exercise publish, display screen, graph, picture, sharing card and so forth.” Though he frames it as a transfer to guard customers’ information, the argument sounds extra like a petty criticism that Garmin is placing its model on the information its merchandise are used to gather.

It is a bizarre lawsuit, and hopefully one that will not trigger any disruptions for both firm’s clients.